Deep Spacecraft I Have Known
Deep Spacecraft I Have Known
Up close and personal
Contents
1 Voyager Mission (1977 to Present)
1.1 Where are they now?
1.2 Onboard computers
1.3 Little known factoids
2 Galileo Mission (1989 to 2003)
3 What I Worked On (1981 to 1982)
1 Voyager Mission (1977 to Present)
These machines are the most distant man-made objects in the universe and are a testament to
both NASA's awesome engineering capabilites and the role of robust robots vs. manned missions.
Moreoever, they are still operating and now performing measurements that were not even conceived of during their original design,
some 40 years ago.
Launched
in 1977: Voyager 2 on August 20 followed by Voyager 1 on September 5.
Solar power is not an option because the distances from the sun are too great.
Therefore, an onboard power system called an RTG
(Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator) is employed.
The RTG's are contained in the 3 canisters at the lower
left of the spacecraft.
The Voyager RTG's use a plutonium oxide nuclear reactor to produce heat which is
continuously converted into electrical current via the
Seebeck effect—essentially
a semiconducting thermocouple. The Seeback material used in
the Voyager spacecraft is a doped Si-Ge semiconducting alloy-not crystaline
silicon but amorphous silicon similar to that used in solar panels. Original
power output was about 400 watts. Think about it, that's equivalent to just ten
40-watt light bulbs! Today, it has probably degraded to something like 300 watts
or less because of the precipitation effects described below.
Both spacecraft know how to communicate on Twitter (see below). Here's an example:
@NASAVoyager2 Voyager2
Adjusting my sun sensor bias to better point my High Gain Antenna at
Earth: AACS:AC7SSB 4+170 SS BIAS CONTROL YAW
Voyager 2 is the more garrulous of the
two, but Voyager 1 also tweets once daily at 1200 UTC on the same account.
1.1 Where are they now?
1.2 Onboard computers
The Voyager mission was officially approved in
May 1972.
At that time, hand-held calculators were the only computers available to the mass consumer market.
A moment's reflection quickly leads to questions about the type of computer control used on the Voyager.
There are three types of computers
on the Voyager spacecraft and there are two of each kind for redundancy.
- Computer Command System (CCS): 18-bit word, interrupt type processors (2) with 4096 words each of plated wire, non-volatile memory.
- Flight Data System (FDS): 16-bit word machine (2) with modular memories and 8198 words each
- Attitude and Articulation Control System (AACS): 18-bit word machines (2) with 4096 words each.
Each processor uses a 12-bit wide word with 64 instructions.
They were built using custom TTL and discrete logic, manufactured by General Electric to JPL specifications.
Remarks that they employed either of the
RCA 1802 or the
Intel 8008
microprocessor apparently have
no factual basis.
1.3 Little known factoids
- In 1998 Voyager 1 surpassed the distance record held by the (now defunct)
Pioneer 10 spacecraft launched in 1972.
The difference comes from the greater velocity of Voyager due to gravitational sling-shot effects.
- Deep spacecraft cannot use solar power (see above).
- Transmission rate with the DSN is 160 baud. Probably the slowest modem you ever used was 300 baud (if you ever used a modem).
- They each have 16 hydrazine thrusters for attitude and articulation control.
- They have used up a little over half their 100 kg of propellant as of April 2006.
- What we look like from deep space.
- The gold-plated copper plaque on Voyager
differs from the Pioneer plaque
in that it is a circular disk with recorded tracks on one side (vinyl LP style).
- Unlike the Pioneer plaque, the Voyager plaque does not provide any information about the size of humans relative to the
spacecraft (if it were ever to be captured by intelligent exo-solar life forms). This strikes me as a gross oversight.
- The diameter of the dish antenna on the Pioneer is 2.74 meters (approx. 9 feet) while the Voyager dish diameter is about 1/3rd bigger at
3.7 meters (approx. 12 feet or twice the height of an average human).
2 Galileo Mission (1989 to 2003)
Launched
October 18, 1989 after being shelved for many years due to reductions in NASA funding.
The RTG power system employed a doped La-Cu-O thermoelectric semiconductor. The
RTG's are located in the canisters on the left side of the spacecraft.
The Galileo spacecraft's 14-year
odyssey
ended on Sunday, Sept. 21, 2003 when it
passed into Jupiter's shadow and disintegrated in the planet's dense atmosphere
at 11:57 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time. The Deep Space Network tracking station in
Goldstone, Calif., received the last signal at 12:43:14 PDT. The delay being due
to the speed of light.
3 What I Worked On (1981 to 1982)
Syncal Corporation was a small consulting company located in Sunnyvale,
California, that had contracts with NASA and JPL to develop the RTG
thermoelectric materials for NASA's deep-space missions, like Galileo. It was
later bought by Thermo Electron Inc.
in 1982 (now Thermo Fisher Scientific). The
first task I was given, was to analyze thermal stability data from the Voyager
RTG. It was during that project that I discovered the stability of the Voyager
Si-Ge thermoelectric material was controlled by a
soliton precipitation.
Here's the 1982 IEEE paper (PDF) that discusses the mechanism in detail.
Over a very long period of time, the thermal gradient eventually
drives the Ge out of solution. Remarkably, I was able to draw heavily on certain
mathematical results from my Ph.D. thesis—which had nothing to do with either
RTGs or the Seebeck effect.
Table 1: My 1981 presentation slides for JPL
This project also had a peculiar sense of time-travel about it, because I was
trying to answer questions about the future operation of these spacecraft based
on data captured serveral years before they were launched, while they were already traveling in deep space.
Anything that was discovered now (at that time) would be too late as far as
changing the Voyager design was concerned. Put another way, it was like traveling in a car,
where I was looking out the rear window with a telescope to help others, who
were driving, to take the best path forward in a different car. Of course, the point was that any
hindsight gained about the Voyager RTG characteristics could only be used in the
design of the newer Galileo RTGs.
In case you are wondering, the data that I analyzed were not transmitted from
the Voyager in real time. Rather, these data had been collected from lab ovens
at JPL, where samples of thermoelectric material had been subjected to
accelerated thermal cycling. JPL wanted to use any Voyager information as a
foundation for selecting the next generation of Seebeck materials for the
Galileo project.
File translated from
TEX
by
TTH,
version 3.38.
On 17 Nov 2011, 17:37.